An update! I haven’t been sure what to do since ending the surrogates project, so I’ve just taken to what I do best... drawing and making books.
I’ve been saving my medicine packets for a long time in my vaguely obsessive-compulsive paranoia that they may come in useful, and hey, they did! I’ve been making books to go in them:





The covers are bound in the medicinal instruction leaflets.
This concept came from a small obsession with the tangible nature of books, and tangible, intimate objects in general. One of the problems I have with what you could say is the more ‘pretentious’ end of book arts is the
book in a glass cabinet error. How ridiculous and pompous! Of course it’s natural to want to protect something you’ve worked so hard on, but in my opinion a
book in a glass cabinet is no longer a book at all. Why would it be – it’s not like you can pick it up and hold it or look beyond the page presented. It has lost all the delicate and fragile intimacy that to me makes a book what it is, and makes it such a unique form to work with, within art.
So... We had book-in-a-cup. Paper off-cut book. Smaller and smaller books for smaller and smaller pockets. Eventually the books were small enough to fit in a matchbox. So, of course, I made a book in a matchbox; the matchbook.
A lot of people I’ve spoken to agree – there is something particular about a book in a box.
I haven’t begun to think about that too much just yet, let alone the connotations of using these medicinal dregs to bring the books together.
How is a book in a box once containing matches different to a book in a box once containing 10mg antibiotics?